Hi Pete
The 2H wasn't to bad to operate when you think of what came before, Rope shovels! in its day the 2H was cutting edge technology
Weatherill
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 10:51 pm
- Real name: Andy Carlson
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
- Flag:
Re: Weatherill
john wrote:Hi Andy I think it only had a buffer beam at the rear but retained it loader arms and bucket as shunting was a secondary job for the machine. Early shutters had frames to connect front and rear buffer beam because they were based on tractors and therefore only had light weight body panels which were to light to take the forces generated in shunting later machines were based on loading shovels which all had strong mainframes.
Cheers John. Sounds like you know a bit about this specific machine... or maybe I am reading too much into your answer? I'm not sure what use an oil depot would have had for a loading shovel TBH. The depot existed from the inter-war period and as far as I know they managed without a shovel until 1977.
I guess it could have been second hand in 1977 (or maybe a non-Weatherill conversion job even?) but it looks fairly pristine in the earlier photo.
Regards, Andy
-
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:43 am
- Real name: essexpete
- Has thanked: 854 times
- Been thanked: 697 times
Re: Weatherill
John T is an ex FE Weatherill service man.
John I guess you are right about the early 2H but FEW did seem to run it on and overlap with other models such as the 12H and 22H.
John I guess you are right about the early 2H but FEW did seem to run it on and overlap with other models such as the 12H and 22H.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 10:51 pm
- Real name: Andy Carlson
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
- Flag:
Re: Weatherill
On a slightly different tack I noticed a posting from John some way back up this thread suggesting that he had an L61 spec sheet.
Could I put in a polite request for some scans of that sheet when time permits please?
I'm planning to build a 1:152 scale model of a Weatherill machine and the L61 looks like a more practical option than some of the other possibilities... as well as being a fine looking machine IMHO
I suspect that the L61 also shares a cab with the early 42H which is handy because 42H spec sheet has a little line drawing. An L61 line drawing would be ideal to get the proportions of the rest of the vehicle right but I suspect that nothing like this has survived.
Regards, Andy
Could I put in a polite request for some scans of that sheet when time permits please?
I'm planning to build a 1:152 scale model of a Weatherill machine and the L61 looks like a more practical option than some of the other possibilities... as well as being a fine looking machine IMHO
I suspect that the L61 also shares a cab with the early 42H which is handy because 42H spec sheet has a little line drawing. An L61 line drawing would be ideal to get the proportions of the rest of the vehicle right but I suspect that nothing like this has survived.
Regards, Andy
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:13 pm
- Real name: John Tutt
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
- Flag:
Re: Weatherill
Hi Andy I have PM'd you, although the cabs looked the same they where different. another machine that might be of interest for modelling is the L64 I will send you details of that one as well
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 10:51 pm
- Real name: Andy Carlson
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
- Flag:
Re: Weatherill
A couple of images that I came across while looking at the 4wd vehicles which didn't quite fit with the main suspects...
http://www.gracesguide.co.uk/File:Imv208-p650.jpg - an early L62 without a cab maybe? or something else?
http://tractors.wikia.com/wiki/Weatheri ... l_4X4.jpeg - at first sight it looks like an L61 but the hydraulic rams don't attach in the usual place and the cab windows and bonnet vents are different too.
Regards, Andy
http://www.gracesguide.co.uk/File:Imv208-p650.jpg - an early L62 without a cab maybe? or something else?
http://tractors.wikia.com/wiki/Weatheri ... l_4X4.jpeg - at first sight it looks like an L61 but the hydraulic rams don't attach in the usual place and the cab windows and bonnet vents are different too.
Regards, Andy
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:32 am
- Real name: Fritz Hanisch
- Location: Wiener Neudorf
- Been thanked: 7 times
- Flag:
- Contact:
Re: Weatherill
Hi everyone!
Long ago, since I took a look to this forum...
I was at my Weatherill 2 weeks ago, so I thought, I should post a few answers/infos...
Yes, the plan is to fully restore it! But that's a long way from now...
As you said, the Ford motor is in very good condition, starts very well and runs smooth!
We removed the counterweight for two reasons: First, it was a bit crooked and second, it was much easier to remove a lot of dirt on it and on the bottom of the machine with the counterweight off the loader. I also spent new screws for holding the counterweight, the old ones weren't that good anymore.
One more question: Does anybody know the type of this alternator? Seems, it doesn't load the batterys anymore... Will need a new one.
Original URL: http://up.picr.de/29432984uu.jpg
Original URL: http://up.picr.de/29432985dp.jpg
For all of you two current pictures:
Here is the type plate, maybe some of you have a use for it...
Original URL: http://up.picr.de/29432983wo.jpg
And here the loader itself, 2 weeks ago:
Original URL: http://up.picr.de/29432986un.jpg
Long ago, since I took a look to this forum...
I was at my Weatherill 2 weeks ago, so I thought, I should post a few answers/infos...
Jeremy Rowland wrote:Many thanks Fritz for sharing the photos of your shovel I assume that you are going to fully restore it? Many old machines manage to survive in remarkably good condition considering their age; the trusty Ford motor is also a great engine, usually very reliable and good starters to boot.
Yes, the plan is to fully restore it! But that's a long way from now...
As you said, the Ford motor is in very good condition, starts very well and runs smooth!
essexpete wrote:Great to see! Was the age established I can't remember? It must be fairly early by the engine. Why did you remove the weight?
We removed the counterweight for two reasons: First, it was a bit crooked and second, it was much easier to remove a lot of dirt on it and on the bottom of the machine with the counterweight off the loader. I also spent new screws for holding the counterweight, the old ones weren't that good anymore.
One more question: Does anybody know the type of this alternator? Seems, it doesn't load the batterys anymore... Will need a new one.
Original URL: http://up.picr.de/29432984uu.jpg
Original URL: http://up.picr.de/29432985dp.jpg
For all of you two current pictures:
Here is the type plate, maybe some of you have a use for it...
Original URL: http://up.picr.de/29432983wo.jpg
And here the loader itself, 2 weeks ago:
Original URL: http://up.picr.de/29432986un.jpg
Best regards from Austria,
Fritz
------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Forum: www.schwerlastaustria.at
Visit my YouTube-Channel: www.youtube.com/user/baggerfritz
Fritz
------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Forum: www.schwerlastaustria.at
Visit my YouTube-Channel: www.youtube.com/user/baggerfritz
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests