The way we were

Discuss equipment which does not fit in in the other forums here, like cable cranes, material handlers, drilling, piling and screen equipment
User avatar

Topic author
FOWLER MAN
Posts: 2358
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:28 pm
Real name: fred evans
Has thanked: 1295 times
Been thanked: 1111 times
Flag: Wales

Re: The way we were

Post #301 by FOWLER MAN » Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:29 pm

Hello John,
Thanks for your reply.
I knew about thr Blaw Knox "Hydrascoop" theres a pic of one working on page 24 of this thread.
It was basicly a BK 50. It used the BK50 undercariage and running gear, bottom end and travel machinery. An uprated Perkins engine and the BK50 winches. The hydraulics were only used to crowd and tip the 1.1/2 yard bucket and I think to push it forward :?: :?:
I dont know much about the spec. but it had 12 ft. level bucket stroke on the ground and a discharge height of 9ft. 10 inches. BK advert below with same pic as you posted.

Image

I don't know what model Lovatts Northwest was, I thought it may have been a 2.1/2 yard 80D but looking again I think it's probably a bit smaller. The one I worked on, (and I don't remember the model), had a Brilliant Murphy Diesel in it.
I have plenty of pics. showong the same type of gantry on various models.
Image

User avatar

Shovelman
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:38 am
Real name: John D. Cunningham
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: The way we were

Post #302 by Shovelman » Sat Sep 12, 2015 4:12 pm

Fred,

I couldn't tell by the photo I had seen, but your advert clearly shows the cable hoist arrangement. So; I guess it's more like a Koehring 205 SKOOPER (photo attached) than the Insley HL-5000.

Image
Original URL: http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f372/shovelman1/205_zpsd78xxqay.jpg

One thing that is a bit puzzling is if it only had a 1.5yd3 bucket, how in the world could it load 5yd3s in 45 seconds?

Out of curiosity; what is the print date on the 80-D brochure you posted the cover shot of?

'All the best,

John

User avatar

Topic author
FOWLER MAN
Posts: 2358
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:28 pm
Real name: fred evans
Has thanked: 1295 times
Been thanked: 1111 times
Flag: Wales

Re: The way we were

Post #303 by FOWLER MAN » Thu Sep 17, 2015 5:37 pm

Hello again John,
Thanks for the reply,the brochure I posted is undated too.
I know that Northwest Engineering introduced the 80 in 1933, it was replaced by the 80D in 1937 and the 80D remained in production till the early 1980s. They apparently made over 2,600 of them.
There were constant improvements and by the early to middle 60s the Murphy engine had been uprated to a Turbocharged "model 21" giving 178 hp. @ 1,200 rpm. The capacity had been increased from 2 to 2.1/2 yards and they were on full air control. The 80D weighed 65 tons.
I too have pictures of the 80D with the gantry illustrated, with a taller gantry and with no gantry atall. :? :?

As you say it's hard to see how the Blaw Knox could load 5 cu yards in 45 secs. :o
I suppose you might get two cycles in 45 secs. in perfect conditions. So if the bucket had a struck capacity of 1.5 yards you would have to get an extra yard heaped on top each time. :think: :?: :?:

Peppers, the firm I worked for who had the BK50 also had a Koehring 205 Scooper, (see below).
Theres also a very interesting bonneted Thornycroft "Big Ben" dump truck in the pic. I never had anythong to do with either of these. :thumbup:

Fred
Image

User avatar

modelman093
Posts: 646
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:18 am
Real name: Angus Shapland
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 72 times
Flag: Great Britain

Re: The way we were

Post #304 by modelman093 » Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:47 pm

That Big Ben has more than a touch of Mighty Antar about it.


Jeremy Rowland
Moderator
Posts: 8677
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:36 pm
Real name: Jeremy Rowland
Has thanked: 1873 times
Been thanked: 1692 times

Re: The way we were

Post #305 by Jeremy Rowland » Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:49 pm

modelman093 wrote:That Big Ben has more than a touch of Mighty Antar about it.


You must have read my mind I thought the same when I saw it. :thumbup:

Jeremy

User avatar

Topic author
FOWLER MAN
Posts: 2358
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:28 pm
Real name: fred evans
Has thanked: 1295 times
Been thanked: 1111 times
Flag: Wales

Re: The way we were

Post #306 by FOWLER MAN » Sat Sep 19, 2015 1:07 am

Jeremy Rowland wrote:
modelman093 wrote:That Big Ben has more than a touch of Mighty Antar about it.


You must have read my mind I thought the same when I saw it. :thumbup:

Jeremy


Hi Angus and Jeremy,
Are you both too polite to say you think I got it wrong :?: :?: :lol:

The bonneted "Big Ben" was developed as an oilfield truck with 200 hp. AEC power and 6x6 or 6x4 drive and it does look like the "Mighty Antar." :thumbup: (Advertisment from commercial Motor 1963).
There was also a "Big Ben" crane carrier chasis.
Two pics below, one with an RB crane, but what make is the other crane :?: (R.H.Neal) :?: :?: :?
Image
Image
Image

User avatar

modelman093
Posts: 646
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:18 am
Real name: Angus Shapland
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 72 times
Flag: Great Britain

Re: The way we were

Post #307 by modelman093 » Sat Sep 19, 2015 8:54 pm

FOWLER MAN wrote:
Jeremy Rowland wrote:
modelman093 wrote:That Big Ben has more than a touch of Mighty Antar about it.


You must have read my mind I thought the same when I saw it. :thumbup:

Jeremy


Hi Angus and Jeremy,
Are you both too polite to say you think I got it wrong :?: :?: :lol:


Me , polite? only on leap years!
I looked at it , thought Antar but realised that the bonnet was not wide enough . Never seen a tipper but very similar front end to the oil field trucks that they used to build - the ones with the flat bed and winch for uplifting skid mounted equipment.


Jeremy Rowland
Moderator
Posts: 8677
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:36 pm
Real name: Jeremy Rowland
Has thanked: 1873 times
Been thanked: 1692 times

Re: The way we were

Post #308 by Jeremy Rowland » Sat Sep 19, 2015 10:33 pm

modelman093 wrote:
FOWLER MAN wrote:
Jeremy Rowland wrote:
modelman093 wrote:That Big Ben has more than a touch of Mighty Antar about it.


You must have read my mind I thought the same when I saw it. :thumbup:

Jeremy


Hi Angus and Jeremy,
Are you both too polite to say you think I got it wrong :?: :?: :lol:


Me , polite? only on leap years!
I looked at it , thought Antar but realised that the bonnet was not wide enough . Never seen a tipper but very similar front end to the oil field trucks that they used to build - the ones with the flat bed and winch for uplifting skid mounted equipment.


There is an article on the Big Ben that I recently saw while browsing the truck 'rags' in a certain famous newsagents so I knew that it was a real truck and not the mighty Antar. :thumbup: :wave:

Jeremy


Mrsmackpaul
Posts: 1007
Joined: Mon May 06, 2013 11:02 am
Real name: Paul Griffiths
Has thanked: 384 times
Been thanked: 256 times
Flag: Australia

Re: The way we were

Post #309 by Mrsmackpaul » Sun Sep 20, 2015 12:33 pm

I have some adds for them in old Australian "Truck and Bus" magazines but have never seen one in the flesh I dont even no if any were sold out here ??

Paul
Your better to die trying than live on your knees begging


hair bear
Posts: 992
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 11:14 pm
Real name: Rob
Location: Hampshire
Has thanked: 195 times
Been thanked: 281 times
Flag: Great Britain

Re: The way we were

Post #310 by hair bear » Sun Sep 20, 2015 9:35 pm

Two pics below, one with an RB crane, but what make is the other crane :?: (R.H.Neal) :?: :?: :?

Looks a bit Priestman to me.
If a LandRover doesn't leak oil, it's run out.


Return to “Misc earthmoving equipment”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests